2 sept. 2013

Froome, Brownlee and Triathlon Cycling




After the last competition in Stockholm, we have the watts measured by Laurent Vidal.  Thanks again to Vidal for this opportunity to learn some more about cycling.  Vidal produced 368 watts during the 40k; meaning 5.5watts/kg.  This number places him as a Pro Domestique in a cycling team.

Vidal rode two minutes behind the Brownlees for the 40 kilometers ride.  Following the curve power-speed below, we noticed that the Brownlees probably pedaled the same watts in the flat surface of Sweden than when competing in Kitzbuhel, Austria, for Alistair.  Except that the competition in Sweden was flat instead of hilly like in Austria.  Let’s take a look at the graph when comparing watts and speed over a flat surface. 

If we follow the curve we can see that Brownlee went close to what it was predicted for Kitzbuhel, 425 watts during the competition as average.  It is close to the wattage of Chris Froome during the Vuelta a España 2011 time trial when he was recorded.
Total
0:00:00 - 0:56:43
Total Time: 0:56:43
Distance: 47.48 km
Energy: 1379 kJ
TSS: 86 (0.96)
NP: 411
VI: 1.01
Pw:HR 7.85%
EF: 2.80
Gain: 276 m
Loss: - 263 m
Grade:0.0 %
VAM:292
W/Kg:5.8

Min
Avg
Max
Power (Watts):
0
405
766
Speed (km/h):
24.4
50.2
73.8
Pace (min/km):
02:28
01:11
00:49
HR (bpm):
91
147
169
Cadence (rpm):
20
94
114
Elev (m):
832
930
1040
Temp (C):
<28
30
35

Froome was able to go 5 kilometers per hour faster.  It is related to the terrain, but it is also related to the efficiency while cycling.  Efficiency is closely related to technique; meaning effective cornering, cadence while cycling, peaks and accelerations, aerodynamic posturing, etc.  We should learn how to improve efficiency while riding which is done by improving technique.  Armstrong (doped or not) improved his efficiency over the course of seven years that he was tested by Dr. Coyle, 2%.
Vidal could be a good Pro Domestique in a cycling team, according to Coggan.  The numbers given by Vidal, and knowing that he pedaled in the second peloton two minutes behind, mean that cycling has become even more important than swimming or running in triathlon.  According to the numbers, triathletes are average swimmers and average runners compared to the one sport athlete.  The Brownlees need more efficiency to fight for a podium in an elite international criterium biking race, even though they can generate the watts needed when we see what Froome can do with less wattage.

Triathlon in the elite international competition has become a good cycling criterium race for average swimmers and runners.  That is what Alistair showed this last race.




Allen & Coggan Race Category Table
                                            
Men

Women

5 s
1 min
5 min
   FT   

5 s
1 min
5 min
FT

24.04
11.50
7.60
6.40

19.42
9.29
6.61
5.69

23.77
11.39
7.50
6.31

19.20
9.20
6.52
5.61

23.50
11.27
7.39
6.22

18.99
9.11
6.42
5.53
 World Class
23.22
11.16
7.29
6.13

18.77
9.02
6.33
5.44
 (e.g., international pro)
22.95
11.04
7.19
6.04

18.56
8.93
6.24
5.36

22.68
10.93
7.08
5.96

18.34
8.84
6.15
5.28

22.41
10.81
6.98
5.87

18.13
8.75
6.05
5.20

22.14
10.70
6.88
5.78

17.91
8.66
5.96
5.12

21.86
10.58
6.77
5.69

17.70
8.56
5.87
5.03
Exceptional
21.59
10.47
6.67
5.60

17.48
8.47
5.78
4.95
 (e.g., domestic pro)
21.32
10.35
6.57
5.51

17.26
8.38
5.68
4.87

21.05
10.24
6.46
5.42

17.05
8.29
5.59
4.79

20.78
10.12
6.36
5.33

16.83
8.20
5.50
4.70

20.51
10.01
6.26
5.24

16.62
8.11
5.41
4.62

20.23
9.89
6.15
5.15

16.40
8.02
5.31
4.54
 Excellent
19.96
9.78
6.05
5.07

16.19
7.93
5.22
4.46
 (e.g., Cat. 1)
19.69
9.66
5.95
4.98

15.97
7.84
5.13
4.38

19.42
9.55
5.84
4.89

15.76
7.75
5.04
4.29

19.15
9.43
5.74
4.80

15.54
7.66
4.94
4.21

18.87
9.32
5.64
4.71

15.32
7.57
4.85
4.13

18.60
9.20
5.53
4.62

15.11
7.48
4.76
4.05
Very Good
18.33
9.09
5.43
4.53

14.89
7.39
4.67
3.97
 (e.g., Cat. 2)
18.06
8.97
5.33
4.44

14.68
7.30
4.57
3.88

17.79
8.86
5.22
4.35

14.46
7.21
4.48
3.80

17.51
8.74
5.12
4.27

14.25
7.11
4.39
3.72

17.24
8.63
5.01
4.18

14.03
7.02
4.30
3.64

16.97
8.51
4.91
4.09

13.82
6.93
4.20
3.55
 Good
16.70
8.40
4.81
4.00

13.60
6.84
4.11
3.47
(e.g., Cat. 3)
16.43
8.28
4.70
3.91

13.39
6.75
4.02
3.39

16.15
8.17
4.60
3.82

13.17
6.66
3.93
3.31

15.88
8.05
4.50
3.73

12.95
6.57
3.83
3.23

15.61
7.94
4.39
3.64

12.74
6.48
3.74
3.14

15.34
7.82
4.29
3.55

12.52
6.39
3.65
3.06

15.07
7.71
4.19
3.47

12.31
6.30
3.56
2.98
 Moderate
14.79
7.59
4.08
3.38

12.09
6.21
3.46
2.90
 (e.g., Cat. 4)
14.52
7.48
3.98
3.29

11.88
6.12
3.37
2.82

14.25
7.36
3.88
3.20

11.66
6.03
3.28
2.73

13.98
7.25
3.77
3.11

11.45
5.94
3.19
2.65

13.71
7.13
3.67
3.02

11.23
5.85
3.09
2.57

13.44
7.02
3.57
2.93

11.01
5.76
3.00
2.49
Fair 
13.16
6.90
3.46
2.84

10.80
5.66
2.91
2.40
(e.g., Cat. 5) 
12.89
6.79
3.36
2.75

10.58
5.57
2.82
2.32

Aucun commentaire:

Enregistrer un commentaire