This is a very tricky subject. I have touched it several times but never
went over. It is the main reason why we
have to choose our partners; we can become as the ones we critized if we interact with them for a long time:
In statistics, regression
toward (or to) the mean is the phenomenon that if a
variable is extreme on its first measurement, it will tend to be closer to the
average on its second measurement—and, paradoxically, if it is extreme on its
second measurement, it will tend to have been closer to the average on its
first.[1][2][3] To avoid making wrong inferences, regression toward
the mean must be considered when designing scientific experiments and
interpreting data.
This concept has not a translation to Spanish. IT IS
SCARRY! This is a basic concept when
we think about things scientifically; it is a sin ne quo non in science.
It is very important what could happen due to luck or to what we
consider a trend in science:
The concept of regression comes from genetics and was
popularized by Sir Francis Galton during the late 19th century with the publication of Regression towards mediocrity in hereditary
stature.[6] Galton observed that extreme characteristics (e.g.,
height) in parents are not passed on completely to their offspring. Rather, the
characteristics in the offspring regress
towards a mediocre point (a
point which has since been identified as the mean). By measuring the heights of
hundreds of people, he was able to quantify regression to the mean, and
estimate the size of the effect. Galton wrote that, “the average regression of
the offspring is a constant fraction of their respective mid-parental deviations”.
How to influence the regression toward the mean so we
can overcome mediocrity or continue on constant improvement? Gómez and the Brownlees
are able to perform at the top, no matter if it is a wet run or a hilly course
in triathlon. They are always on the
top, not allowing a regression toward the mean.
They do not play dice when performing in triathlon; every move have been
visualized or done previously, nothing is left on the off chance. If we left performance on the off
chance a regression toward the mean is inevitable. This phenomenon happens when the triathlete
is not a good bicycle rider; he depends on the ones pulling the peloton to
chase the first pack, or simply he sits on the pack on the off chance that he
could have a good run (playing the wet run).
This sitting on the wheel of someone is taught to our triathletes,
instead of helping them to improve their bike performance.
Historically, what is now called regression toward the
mean has also been called reversion to
the mean and reversion to
mediocrity.
On the other side, some of the “good” results of our
triathletes could be attributed to a REGRESSION TOWARD THE MEAN. We need to reflect on what we do and what we
need to work on.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire