We have written on how to improve triathlon
performance and posted articles ad nauseam mentioning how to work
toward improving performance, that it is fine and dandy! The only but is that the culture will dictate the
accuracy of the plan. How hard and accurate we work to achieve goals is in the
culture (the team culture). Team culture
is the critical mass that makes the team work the way we want:
Critical
Mass and Tipping
ROBERT V.
DODGE
DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199857203.003.0018
This chapter is about how some things catch on while others do not.
These situations are explained by the model “critical mass,”sometimes referred to
as the “bandwagon effect.” An explanation of critical mass in a nuclear
reaction is related to social science. The success or failure of many things is
determined by whether “critical mass” is achieved so that increasing numbers
are encouraged to join. An example of something achieving critical mass is
presented, and this is McDonalds. The competition between Betamax and VHS for
home video cassettes is discussed, and the 1989 critical mass achieved when
Communist countries began collapsing is outlined. A subset Schelling introduced
is presented and that is “tipping.” This typically refers to racial groups
tipping in and out, as a previously homogeneously racial neighborhood becomes
integrated. Tipping can describe any critical mass phenomenon. The “tipping
point” is the exact point at which the reaction becomes self-sustaining. The
chapter provides a number of instructions on converting numbers into a curve
and determining the location of the tipping point, plus stable outcomes. A
problem presented that deals with the Rodney King trial, which makes for a
dramatic example of how much control of the tipping point can matter as a
policy issue.
We are always looking for the Critical Mass, in places like Mexico we need
to start from zero generating a critical mass to produce a team of winners (a
powerhouse). A critical mass is needed
for an illness to become a pandemic; a number of bacteria (critical mass) is
needed to produce a disease; around or above 15 million spermatozoids are
needed to become pregnant.
A generalized model of social and biological contagion
P.S. Doddsa,_, D.J. Wattsb,c
aInstitute for Social and Economic Research and Policy,
Columbia University, 420 West 118th Street, MC 3355, New York, NY 10027, USA
bDepartment of Sociology, Columbia University, 1180
Amsterdam Avenue, New York, NY 10027, USA
cSanta Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, NM
87501, USA
Received 27 May 2004; received in revised form 15
September 2004; accepted 15 September 2004
Available online 6 November 2004
Abstract
We present a model of
contagion that unifies and generalizes existing models of the spread of social influences
and microorganismal infections. Our model incorporates individual memory of
exposure to a contagious entity (e.g. a rumor or disease), variable magnitudes
of exposure (dose sizes), and heterogeneity in the susceptibility of
individuals. Through analysis and simulation, we examine in detail the case
where individuals may recover from an infection and then immediately become
susceptible again (analogous to the so-called SIS model). We identify three
basic classes of contagion models which we call epidemic threshold, vanishing critical
mass, and critical mass classes, where each
class of models corresponds to different strategies for prevention or facilitation.
We find that the conditions for a particular contagion model to belong to one
of the these three classes depend only on memory length and the probabilities
of being infected by one and two exposures, respectively. These parameters are
in principle measurable for real contagious influences or entities, thus
yielding empirical implications for our model. We also study the case where
individuals attain permanent immunity once recovered, finding that epidemics
inevitably die out but may be surprisingly persistent when individuals possess
memory.
r 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Contagion; Epidemic; Memory; Treshold; Dose response
Europe and America knew about the presence of Ebola in
Africa since the early 70’s or before.
We knew about the presence of AIDS in Africa since the 19th
century; in Medical School, I learned about the regions where Kaposi’s sarcoma was
endemic in Africa; such sarcoma was killing people in less than two years, it
was compared to the Mediterranean Kaposi’s sarcoma that was present in Europa. The
European sarcoma was relatively benign and it was present in old persons. It
took 30 years for us, medical students, to know that it was AIDS; until the American
patients were treated in California (1984).
Few cases were seen in the 40’s in the USA, they were treated for pneumonia;
the radiologists used to call the thorax X-ray, gay’s lungs. The few patients dying from AIDS in the USA did
not make the critical mass in the 40’s and 50’s; it happened until the 80’s. Ebola has the following chronological
appearance according to USA CDC:
1989
|
USA
|
Reston
virus
|
0
|
0
|
Ebola-Reston virus was introduced into quarantine facilities in
Virginia and Pennsylvania by monkeys imported from the Philippines.
|
1979
|
Sudan
(South Sudan)
|
Sudan
virus
|
34
|
22
(65%)
|
Occured in Nzara, Maridi. Recurrent outbreak at the same site as the
1976 Sudan epidemic
|
1977
|
Zaire
|
Ebola
virus
|
1
|
1
(100%)
|
Noted retrospectively in the village of Tandala.
|
1976
|
England
|
Sudan
virus
|
1
|
0
|
Laboratory infection by accidental stick of contaminated needle.
|
1976
|
Sudan
(South Sudan)
|
Sudan
virus
|
284
|
151
(53%)
|
Occurred in Nzara, Maridi and the surrounding area. Disease was spread
mainly through close personal contact within hospitals. Many medical care personnel
were infected.
|
1976
|
Zaire (Democratic Republic of the Congo - DRC)
|
Ebola
virus
|
318
|
280
(88%)
|
Occurred in Yambuku and surrounding area. Disease was spread by close
personal contact and by use of contaminated needles and syringes in
hospitals/clinics. This
outbreak was the first recognition of the disease.
|
We have been working on the critical mass to produce
the powerhouse we want to be able to improve triathlon performance. Education plays the major role and nothing
can replace it.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire