What does it
mean the loss of the grand narratives?
Let´s see Wikipedia:
A
metanarrative (from meta grand narrative), in critical theory, and particularly
in postmodernism, is an abstract idea that is thought to be[who?] a
comprehensive explanation of historical experience or knowledge…In postmodern
philosophy, a metanarrative is an untold story that unifies and totalizes the
world, and justifies a culture's power structures. Examples of these stories
are nationalisms, religion, and science, to name a few. Metanarratives are not
usually told outright, but are reinforced by other more specific narratives told
within the culture…
Replacing grand, universal narratives with small,
local narratives
According to
the advocates of postmodernism, metanarratives have lost their power to
convince – they are, literally, stories that are told in order to legitimize
various versions of 'the truth'. With the transition from modern to postmodern,
Lyotard proposes that metanarratives should give way to petits récits, or more
modest and "localized" narratives.[citation needed] Borrowing from
the works of Wittgenstein and his theory of the "models of
discourse,"[5] Lyotard constructs his vision of a progressive politics
that is grounded in the cohabitation of a whole range of diverse and always
locally legitimated language games. Postmodernists attempt to replace metanarratives
by focusing on specific local contexts as well as the diversity of human
experience. They argue for the existence of a "multiplicity of theoretical
standpoints"[6] rather than grand, all-encompassing theories.
Nothing new,
it took almost a century since our great Albert Einstein opened up this new
era. In his book where he explained
relativity in 1921, he reasoned:
The genius
of Einstein’s discoveries is that he looked at the experiments and assumed the
findings were true. This was the exact opposite of what other physicists seemed
to be doing. Instead of assuming the theory was correct and that the
experiments failed, he assumed that the experiments were correct and the theory
had failed.
What in hell
triathlon has to do with the loss of grand narratives?
Triathlon
coaches see the Brownlees, the Armstrongs and they do not want to see what they
see to start thinking, but explained things stupidly as: “They doped;” “they
are genetically special.” Without the
Grand Narratives we are lost, but we could have a better second chance as
mentioned below.
Think about
Queen, the members had “formal” training in classical music. The same thing happened to Einstein in
Physics. After getting that “formal”
training you start your creation and the needed distance from what is known and
taught to create and think. If we do not
get the formal training we can end up like the Greeks, the Mayas, the Incas,
the Zapotecs (first written language in America), the Aztecs, the Egyptians;
they do not know where and when the Grand Narratives were lost in their
cultures and perhaps they do not even know what they were and what they are. I like the film My Life is in ruins for that reason. We have written in this blog related
subjects, April 16, 2012. WHAT A CYBERNETIC TRIATHLON HISTORY IS; and April 25,
2012. GREGORY HOUSE, BRUCE MILLER AND THE ART OF TRIATHLON COACHING.
Eduardo lost
the race in Edmonton in the last 200 meters.
He froze during the last 200 meters and entered third. We have been talking about the situation
using simple narratives. As shown in
Coach Carter film where it is said that the “fear to win” is real; doing as
Einstein, “deconstructing reality” using simple language like fear. Please read our previous post. Einstein said: "La única justificación de nuestros conceptos y sistema de conceptos reside en el hecho que pueden representar el complejo de nuestras experiencias; pero fuera de ello no poseen otro título de legitimidad." El Significado de la Relatividad. 1993. Planeta, Barcelona.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire