In Part 1 of triathlon and research we spoke about the
one subject research and mentioned as a matter of conclusion: “That
is the reason why we have ONE SUBJECT EXPERIMENTATION; we can point out the
kind of educational handicap.”
How we go about it?
How we do it? There is an
interesting research done by George Vaillant for decades. Vaillant has followed patients for decades to
find out about the NATURAL HISTORY OF LIFE. One
needs a lot of support to do this kind of research; fortunately he has done
this for us.
George Eman Vaillant, M.D. (born 1934) is an American psychiatrist and Professor at Harvard
Medical School
and Director of Research for the Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital. Dr. Vaillant has spent his research career charting
adult development and the recovery process of schizophrenia, heroin addiction, alcoholism, and personality
disorder.
He has spent the last 30 years as Director of the Study of Adult Development at
the Harvard
University Health Service. The study has prospectively charted the lives of 824 men and
women for over 60 years.
Valliant’s most interesting research is related to
defense mechanisms which were based on his research of the NATURAL HISTORY of a
cohort of Harvard students studied by him for decades:
In George
Eman Vaillant's (1977) categorization, defences form a continuum related to their psychoanalytical developmental level.[14] Vaillant's levels are:
- Level I - pathological defences (i.e. psychotic denial, delusional projection)
- Level II - immature defences (i.e. fantasy, projection, passive aggression, acting out)
- Level III - neurotic defences (i.e. intellectualization, reaction formation, dissociation, displacement, repression)
- Level IV - mature defences (i.e. humour, sublimation, suppression, altruism, anticipation)
He divided the mechanism according to “the level of
success in life,” achieved by subjects he studied. We based most of my judgments on the findings
done by Vaillant. Certain defense
mechanisms are needed for success and Vaillant considered them mature.
His 1977 book, Adaptation
to Life,
depicted the men at midlife and analyzed their personalities in terms of a
hierarchy of defense mechanisms—characteristic ways of handling emotional
conflict and stress—that ranged from low-level, immature defenses like blatant
denial and passive aggression to mature adaptations such as altruism, humor,
and the sublimation of energies into art. Now, in Aging Well, he writes that “…it is social aptitude, not
intellectual brilliance or parental social class, that leads to successful
aging.” Furthermore, the habitual use of these mature coping styles—ways of
“making a lemon into lemonade,” in his words—is, in psychological and social
terms, the most powerful predictor of successful aging.
We studied our athletes according to the defense mechanisms
they use to predict success. When
struggling for high performance goals, the mature mechanisms are needed to get
there. Success is related to these
mechanisms and less so on physical atributes.
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire