4 déc. 2020

Triathlon and Gennadi Touretski

 

¡Rest in peace Gennadi!  You left many things to this world and we will try to continue your legacy. 

When I met Gennadi he was coaching at Tenero, Switzerland.  He was the coach of the Swiss Team.  It happened that I was there and watched his pupils training.  It was before eight in the morning and the pool was used by the Swiss team.  I stopped to watch them swim.  I sat at the only chair and desk right at the swimming pool.  Gennadi appeared around eight and asked me what I was doing on his desk.  I apologized and said that I was just watching his pupils swimming.  I asked him if I needed to go and he said: “you can stay.”  I stayed for two weeks watching his work which he explained in details.  At that time, I was familiar with the work of Paul Bergen, Bob Bowman and the rest, but Gennadi was too far away from them.  A different concept regarding swimming.  He was coaching Daniella Ryf and Ian Thorpe when I was there.  Gennadi told me about the communication with Paul Bergen during the cold war; Bergen was USA national coach, and he was the Russian swimming national coach.  Gennadi was the Russian 1,500 meters swimming champion at one point.  During the two weeks, he mentioned the problems he had in Australia where he was coaching.  At Tenero, he was swimming daily to keep in good health, keeping a healthy diet and giving up drinking. 

Gennadi’s art work was Alexander Popov.  He said that when he started coaching eight-year-old children -800 children sent by the Russian State, Popov and V. Ekimov were in the bunch.  A cyclist was needed in the Russian team and a decision was made to send Ekimov to practice cycling.  “Eki,” as Lance Armstrong used to call him, went on to win three gold medals, twice time trial Olympic champion.  Ekimov was one of the Lance Armstrong’s domestiques in the US Postal Team.

Every drill Popov practiced was with the intension of swimming with the whole body.  The concept of “swimming on the wave” created by the swimmer was emphasized in Popov, as well as, the kayak swimming.  His way of thinking was of an engineer, because he was trained as an engineer.  He believed that we needed to observed the marine animals to learn more about swimming.  I let you see a documentary of Popov and Gennadi.  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8BrRIZFk7O4&t=987s



Thanks Gennadi!  Our children benefit from you without knowing you.

10 nov. 2020

Triathlon and the Dunning-Kruger Effect

 We are familiar with this effect for quite some time.  Jesus mentioned it when he was on the cross:

Then Jesus said, “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing.” And they divided up His garments by casting lots. The people stood watching, and the rulers sneered at Him, saying, “He saved others; let Him save Himself if He is the Christ of God, the Chosen One.”… https://biblehub.com/luke/23-34.htm

Jesus did not experiment as David Dunning and Justin Kruger; he just knew it.  As psychiatrists we are familiar with this effect and it is the pillar in treatment.  The patient should know reality.  Reality is necessary to get out of the hole where we are sometimes; but in order to know reality we need to know basic life’s principles.  Not everybody is knowledgeable about these principles related to humans; reason why a good psychotherapy is necessary and it implies an education about life.  Let’s Dunning, himself, explained what he wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AOPyzgIwy9U



We have this problem of Dunning-Kruger effect in triathlon when dealing with Federations and other organizations related to triathlon; not to mentioned other coaches.  Let’s listen to Malcolm Brown when he explains his project working with the Brownlee brothers.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=od0i2BrTQvI



Our first task in our team to improve performance is to teach where we are.  We are working with the lowest 25th percentile in triathlon worldwide. “Where we are” becomes the most important matter to teach in order to evaluate our training and progress.  It takes years, if it happens, to see the mediocrity where we are.  Teaching to overcome mediocrity is easier if we succeed in giving the tools to evaluate quality, basic life’s principles are part of the tools.  High performance training in Mexico without looking at the Dunning-Kruger effect is not possible.

4 oct. 2020

Triathlon, Trump and Coronavirus

 

We have been writing about coronavirus for a while.  We have mentioned that we had 120 patients treated with steroids -cero deaths at the end of June; we have around 400 now.  Our article was written before the appearance of articles related to dexamethasone and coronavirus.  Dexamethasone was prohibited as a medication for COVID 19 by the WHO and the CDC at the begining of the pandemic, it was accepted for the very ill later.  The photo screenshot of the abstract sent to the NEJM is below.  The article was not reviewed by the journal. We did not use antivirals because they were not specifics, assuming what we know about the use of dexamethasone in HIV positive patients.  This wonder drug rescued Trump from dropping oxygen saturations episodes.  It was not Remdesivir the wonderful drug.  Until he got dexamethasone, Trump felt better and could breathe better.  This very cheap drug can save millions of lives related to coronavirus and not a vaccine or the antivirals.  The problem is that dexamethasone is not business (money).  It was advertised for the severely ill but we can use when we see the shortness of breath and desaturation.  C-reactive protein could be as low as 2.



8 juin 2020

Triathlon and Coronavirus Treatment in Oaxaca II

 

 

We mentioned the reason why we post this subject here:  we do not have other place to post it.  Mexico is the third country in the Americas regarding the number of contagious people and respective deaths.  We are at the peak of the epidemic at the present time.  We come from this small city in Mexico and we speak about a village near Oaxaca where we follow up patients with covid 19.  Our friend is the one on the frontline, we just support him.  The price for each treatment is $5,000.00 pesos ($220 dollars), so people can afford it. $25.00 dollars for the initial consultation and the rest is for medications.  Close to 100 patients with covid 19 and zero deaths.

We can start talking why patients are not dying as it is the case in Mexico where mortality is around 6%.  Two things are present:

1)   Excellent service and follow up.  Timing is the key when taking care of patients.

1.1)      The protocol starts with routine laboratory:

CBC with differential.

Chem 18.

CRP.

Chest X-ray.

1.2)     Management will depend on findings.  Antivirals and antibiotics are given routinely.  Prednisone will be given depending on the degree of inflammation.  Prednisone because is the cheapest, it exists in any pharmacy stock, and it is well known to us (starting with 50 mgrs).  Heparin is given according to the situation (80 mgrs. of Clexane a day).

 

2)   The burden and stress of hospitalization is not present.

2.1)   Patients will keep moving to avoid atelectasis, thrombus and interestingly they have better ventilation.

2.2) Oxygen was not given because it was not available but we have learned that even when they have O2 saturation in the low 80, they can still move and they have a good outcome from what we know (no one has died).

 

Taking care of patients is similar to taking care of athletes.  Attention to details is important.  Athletes and patients should know that they are getting the best care available.  They have to believe in what we are doing.  Science as Albert Einstein puts it and it should be present: “Science is the refinement of every day thinking; common sense thinking.”

 

I let you enjoyed the lake where we train in Oaxaca.  



We follow our own protocol:

21 avr. 2020

Triathlon and Team Oaxaca Coronavirus Guidelines

 

We started learning since the beginning of the pandemic about the virus, to face the situation.  We have learned the following:

1)   The virus is transmitted via aerosol in addition to saliva drops.  Why?  We have the story about the chorus rehearsing and apparently keeping the distance between two people.  They said: “No one sneezed or coughed.”  One-day rehearsal, 60 people practicing, 45 sick, two deaths. https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/01/us/washington-choir-practice-coronavirus-deaths/index.html  This is more anecdotal, if you wish, but we have other sources of information.

 

We have the studies mentioned in the New England Journal of Medicine:

https://www.jwatch.org/

Surgical Masks Provide Source Control of Respiratory Viruses

Richard T. Ellison III, MD reviewing Leung NHL et al. Nat Med 2020 Apr 2 Bae S et al. Ann Intern Med 2020 Apr 6

Surgical face masks were found to reduce presence of influenza and coronavirus RNA in respiratory droplets and aerosols from infected individuals.

The CDC has just recommended that the general U.S. population begin wearing cloth face coverings to decrease the community-based transmission of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Two new studies provide some support for the CDC guidelines.

In the first, researchers at a Hong Kong hospital obtained nasal and throat swabs and respiratory droplet and aerosol samples from 246 individuals with presumed symptomatic acute respiratory viral infection seen year-round between March 2013 and May 2016. During a 30-minute collection of exhaled breaths when patients were breathing and coughing normally, 124 individuals were wearing a face mask and 122 were not; 49 provided second 30-minute samples of the alternate type.

By reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) there were 54 individuals with rhinovirus infection, 43 with influenza infection, and 17 with human seasonal coronavirus infection. For all three viruses, the viral load was higher in nasal than in oral secretions, and all three viruses were detectable in both respiratory droplet (particles >5 μm) and aerosol (particles <5 μm) fractions of the exhaled breath. Masks led to a notable reduction in the number of RT-PCR–positive respiratory droplet and aerosol samples for patients with either coronavirus (in respiratory droplets, from 30% to 0%; aerosols, 40% to 0%) or influenza infection (respiratory droplets, 26% to 4%; aerosols, 35% to 22%); there was no meaningful reduction seen with rhinovirus infections. Influenza virus was able to be grown from 4 of 5 studied RT-PCR–positive aerosol samples from individuals not wearing masks.

The second study, by Bae and colleagues, recruited 4 patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection to cough five times onto petri dishes containing viral transport media approximately 20 cm from their face while wearing either no mask, a surgical face mask, or a two-ply cotton mask. The median nasopharyngeal viral load was 5.66 log copies/mL, and the cough samples found viral loads of 1.4 to 3.5 logs/mL whether or not a mask was present for three of the four patients. Swabs of the outer surfaces of both types of masks were positive for all four patients.

COMMENT

The work by Leung raises the theoretical concern of viral transmission through aerosols as well as respiratory droplets although, as the authors note, there was no attempt to grow either coronavirus or rhinovirus from the RT-PCR respiratory samples to confirm the presence of viable virus. Still, this novel study provides strong evidence that the use of surgical masks can provide source control for both human coronavirus and influenza virus infections when individuals are sitting for 30 minutes. In contrast, the very small study by Bae shows that neither surgical nor cotton face masks will prevent the spread of virus from a coughing individual — at least at a distance of only 20 cm. While both studies have clear limitations, together they suggest that the use of a surgical face mask can provide some source control in individuals infected with coronavirus or influenza, although the efficacy is likely diminished in coughing individuals (and we can't extrapolate the findings to other types of masks). Still, in my mind these limited data do support the broad use of face masks until this pandemic is brought under control.

 

2)   The German expert who instituted the program in Germany challenged the notion that the virus is primarily acquired touching infected material.  The assumption was that the coronavirus is transmitted via air and not so much by contact.

 

Researchers have so far come to different conclusions on how long the virus can survive on surfaces. But now a team of scientists in Germany are trying to find answers.

 

"So far, no transmission of the virus in supermarkets, restaurants or hairdressers has been proven," explained Bonn virologist Hendrik Streeck on the ZDF Markus Lanz talk show.

 

Instead, the major outbreaks have been the result of close get-togethers over a longer period of time, he said.

 

That's demonstrated in, for example, outbreaks that have stemmed from après-ski parties in Ischgl, at football matches in Bergamo or at carnival celebrations in the municipality of Gangelt in the Heinsberg district of North Rhine-Westphalia.

https://www.thelocal.de/20200402/how-german-scientists-hope-to-find-answers-on-coronavirus-in-countrys-worst-hit-spot

3)   The lakes, ocean are not infected to the degree of being a source of infection.  The problem is that we still get aerosol from infected people because those places are crowded most of the time.  The infection is not in the water.

https://www.unwater.org/coronavirus-global-health-emergency/

 

Coronaviruses (CoV) are a large family of viruses that cause illness ranging from the common cold to more severe diseases. According to WHO, while persistence in drinking-water is possible, there is no current evidence that coronaviruses are present in surface or groundwater sources or transmitted through contaminated drinking-water.

The spread of the virus is closely related to water and sanitation.Cleaning hands can reduce the transmission and help people stay healthy but today billions of people lack safe water, sanitation and handwashing and funding is inadequate.

 

Based on the above:

1)   Keep your distance, two meters from other human being.

2)   Wear a face mask according to what you do.  Driving a car with other triathletes, wear a N95 mask; use a surgical mask when riding or running with other mates, keeping most of the time the two meters of separation.

3)   Swim in an empty swimming pool, one member per lane or in a lake (keeping distance).

4)   Wash your hand as frequently as you can or use gel (alcohol above 60%).

5)   Avoid public places or wear your N95 if you need to be in a close room, even if you keep the two meters distance (remember the chorus rehearsal).

6)   Train with responsible people that is concerned about his/her health and the health of others.  This is the moment to define your friends.

7)   This should be in place until we obtain the vaccine or we get 70% infected people.  I hope the vaccine comes first.

31 août 2020

Triathon and Swimming Technique

We have been looking for the Holy Grail all this time.  We worked with Total Immersion at the beginning of our journey –Terry Laughlin, Glenn Mills and the rest of coaches, in many clinics around Mexico.  We went to learn more watching and listening to Dave Salo, always searching for the mystery –trying to feel the water.  We invited Paul Bergen to come to our town to learn from him.  We decided to look someplace else and went to see Gennadi Tourestki (Popov’s mastermind).  We learned a lot about kayaks, using the shoulders to propel the body, and the understanding of swimming on top of the wave from Touretski.  Tourestki let us know that the search should continue when he took Ian Thorpe.  Thorpe tried to return to competitive swimming after long hiatus then.  We never found the Holy Grail until we saw Gregorio Paltrinieri swimming.  The analysis done by Effortless Swimming helps to understand what feeling the water means in the case of Gregorio.


Gregorio developed his own style by feeling the water.  Fortunately, his coach did not modify much and let him feel water.  Gregorio knew and understood by feeling the water that the Holy Grail of swimming was to project the body to the front the most effective way.  He found his own fulcrum and front there projects his body trying to perturb the water the least possible.  He also knew that without kicking he can reach and sustain 90 strokes per minute, moving his body as Michelangelo moving his brush.  The Holy Grail is feeling the water; but unfortunately, we need to be like Michelangelo to be able to perform well.
I let you with my favorite player, Judith Polgar, who knows that to be like Michelangelo we need three things: work, perseverance and passion.
https://www.google.com/search?q=judit+polgar+ted+talk&oq=judith+polgar+ted&aqs=chrome.1.69i57j0l4.11248j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8


20 août 2020

Triathlon and Dr. Zhivago


The pandemic helps to see what is useful and what we thought it was.  People have died because of believing in useless theories about performance; the concept of a good doctor versus a bad one.  A doctor who had good grade at school does not mean much if he/she is unable to perform practicing.  A good doctor in times of COVID 19 should be effective regardless of grades and we see it clearly now; it is more about being passionate to the profession to be able to face the unknown without much fear and with willingness to perform well.  Fear was the first thing doctors experienced in front of the pandemic. Patients should not die from COVID the way it has happened because of our fear that paralyzed us. The use of steroid and other medications to treat COVID patients is an art based on a lot of experience with just a little bit of theory.  Things were very novel and we needed to be guided by our experience; our instinct that developed over many years of seeing patient as mysteries.  Boris Pasternak’s master novel, Dr. Zhivago, is about that.  Performance in triathlon is about the passion for the sport.  Pasternak said the following about revolutionary Russians:
They don't in any way measure up to their exalted calling. In fact, they've fallen short of it but – difficult as it is for me to understand – a modern sophist might say that these last years have actually demanded a reduction in conscience and feeling in the name of greater intelligibility. Yet now the very spirit of the times demands great, courageous purity. And these men are ruled by trivial routine. Subjectively, they're sincere and conscientious. But I find it increasingly difficult to take into account the personal aspect of their convictions. I'm not out on my own – people treat me well. But all that only holds good up to a point. It seems to me that I've reached that point.[22]
Passion for the sport is in this young Ugandan champion: Joshua Cheptegei.



2 août 2020

Triathlon and Coronavirus following Goliath


The title of this “post” comes after two things: The historical revision of David and Goliath by Malcolm Gladwell (below), and the article published at Medscape on July 30,2020:  

COVID-19 Data Dives: Why Arguments Against SARS-CoV-2 Aerosol Transmission Don't Hold Water

The Medscape article showed the ignorance in the medical establishment after reviewing two articles related to the spread of coronavirus by José Luis Jiménez: one was written by the WHO, and the other one appeared in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).  Both of them did not mention by ignorance or negligence, or because they did not want to mention, that the main route of Covid 19 spreading is through aerosol.  These institutions looked like goliath-- following Gladwell analysis, they were unable to perform what the only raison d'être for both of them is: “the analysis and publication of the best research possible.” Our guidelines regarding training in the pandemic considers aerosol as the main route of infection:

21 avr. 2020



Triathlon and Team Oaxaca Coronavirus Guidelines


We started learning since the beginning of the pandemic about the virus, to face the situation.  We have learned the following:
1)   The virus is transmitted via aerosol in addition to saliva drops.  Why?  We have the story about the chorus rehearsing and apparently keeping the distance between two people.  They said: “No one sneezed or coughed.”  One-day rehearsal, 60 people practicing, 45 sick, two deaths. https://edition.cnn.com/2020/04/01/us/washington-choir-practice-coronavirus-deaths/index.html  This is more anecdotal, if you wish, but we have other sources of information.

The article written by José Luis Jiménez made the mentioned above institutions looked like Goliath.  José, like David, armed with his slingshot killed them.  This situation is not to be cheerful about it; but on the contrary, we should be sad about what we are living.  José’s article shows how the establishment deteriorated over the years: “compadres” were invited to do research or to peer reviewed research.  Unfortunately, this is not only related to this subject but it is present in all our existence: “compadres” are invited to do things that they barely know.  We have two good examples of how they do it: Trump and López Obrador.  The International Unions are also a good example, look at the IAAF and FIFA, to mention two that currently are having what we have known for years, corruption and more corruption.  Let go back into business.  We will discuss José’s article.

“I am an aerosol scientist. I have spent a lot of time examining the arguments from some that aerosols play only a very minor role in the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 -- and presenting the evidence that rebuts this claim. A recent article in JAMA argues that aerosols are not an important transmission pathway for SARS-CoV-2. While the article raises good questions, the arguments against aerosols are not consistent with the best science. Here's why I say that:
Aerosol size. Most important, a good understanding of aerosol physics, airflow, and dilution is needed to interpret the behavior of potentially infectious aerosols in complex real-world situations… However, the actual size of droplets that fall to the ground that quickly correspond to sizes larger than 50 μm, so 10 times the size and 1000 (!) times the mass given in the article. This fundamental error has been repeated for decades in guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the World Health Organization (WHO) and in medical papers, despite the correct physics having been figured out by Wells in 1934 and the error having been pointed out many times by other scientists.

This video from Ryan Davis, PhD, gives a more accurate picture of the behavior of ~50 μm aerosols in the air. Even at this size, the aerosols do not fall very rapidly to the ground. For aerosols of 5 μm to fall to the ground quickly, as shown in a short animation from the WHO, gravity on Earth would have to be 100 times larger than it is. This happens...on some stars. A 5 μm aerosol can actually stay suspended in air for 30 minutes indoors.

If 5-μm aerosols fell to the ground as stated by the authors and as shown in the WHO's video, we would not have to worry about aerosol (particulate matter) pollution, because a large fraction of it would fall to the ground so quickly. We also would not have to worry about Saharan dust reaching Florida, because much of the dust mass is composed of aerosols in this size range.

The authors further instruct us that "[a]erosols are smaller particles (≤5 μm) that...are small enough and light enough to remain suspended in the air for hours (analogous to pollen)." This is curious, given that pollen ranges in size from 15 to 200 μm. If pollen aerosols, being larger than 5 μm, actually fell to the ground within 1-2 meters, pollen allergies would not be a problem either. But pollination for many plant species would be very difficult too. Relying on medical doctors for advice about aerosols is like relying on me, an aerosol scientist, for medical advice: not a good idea…

The conversation with a smoker is a qualitative example. But quantitative studies with very detailed physics have been published that estimate exposure to droplets and aerosols in a close proximity situation (often referred to as "close contact," although physical contact is typically not involved)…

Therefore, aerosols probably dominate "close contact" transmission when talking. And talking is the most relevant situation for SARS-CoV-2, which has a major fraction of transmission by asymptomatic and presymptomatic carriers who do not regularly cough. These are the conclusions of a modeling study — it was notably rigorous —using well-established inputs: Newton's laws of motion; the law of gravity; the well-known laws of air drag on moving aerosols; and well-established measurements on the sizes, amounts, and speeds of the expired aerosols. This is not difficult, uncertain physics, such as trying to quantify the expansion of the universe or the mass of neutrinos; it is very well established and tested. Like any scientific study, it has uncertainties, but those are unlikely to reach factors of 100-1000…

Some people argue that the clear effectiveness of limiting "close contact" through social distancing to reduce SARS-CoV-2 transmission demonstrates that droplets, which fall to the ground close to the person, are the dominant mode of transmission, and that the same observation disproves aerosols as an important source of infection. The reality is the opposite. That "close contact" is a major mode of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 does not disprove aerosols. Rather, it is some of the best evidence we have that aerosols are important and very likely major…
Given such a large fraction of spread through superspreading events, I have to agree with Prof. Donald Milton that these events could prove to be the Achilles' heel of SARS-CoV-2, and that we should focus on identifying their causes and preventing their occurrence. Definitely, the environmental conditions are key: indoor spaces, low ventilation, crowding, long duration, no masks, loud conversation or singing. Perhaps also there are unusual individuals who shed a lot more aerosolized virus than the majority of those infected, and for those individuals the contagiousness does approach that of measles?...
Nonaerosol transmission in superspreading events. The authors state that "it is difficult to determine in retrospect all the potential person-to-person interactions that may have happened before, during, and immediately following these events."
Yes, it is difficult. But for the Skagit choir case that we investigated, 53 out of 60 people were infected during a 2.5-hour rehearsal. The choir spokesperson told me, "It is not a highly social group. It is pretty seriously about the singing." Most of the time, choir members were singing in fixed positions, and there was no one within the 1- to 2-meter "landing area" of ballistic droplets in front of the index case.
Members were aware of COVID-19, and reportedly no physical contact between choir members took place. They used hand sanitizer. The index case did not touch the snacks or help distribute the chairs. The index case did visit the restroom, but many members who did not use the restroom were infected.
In any case, fomite transmission appears to be less likely per CDC guidance, while the WHO admits that they do not have direct evidence for it. There was a 15-minute break, during which members talked to "two to three people" on average. Talking between the index case and others "was minimal." Could droplet transmission explain this event? Per the CDC, it would have required “close contact” of at least 15 minutes with 53 people!

Could this choir be an outlier? Well, as we report on our paper, choir cases with high secondary attack rates have also been reported in at least the Netherlands, Austria, Canada, Germany, England, South Korea, and Spain. A similar case in France was just reported. Yet, events like these are being dismissed by what can only be referred to as "contortionist thinking." A scientist interviewed by the New York Times summed it up well: WHO staff members have yet to accept the importance of these case studies and instead have "dreamed up an alternative story" in which an infected person spat on his hands, wiped it on something and "magically" infected numerous other people.

I am high lining this paragraph because this is happening to our leaders when seeing reality.  In Psychiatry this is called PSYCHOSIS!  There is a “contortionist thinking” when approaching problems due to ignorance and lack of desire to do their job.  Less and less people are trained to be responsible for what they do.  I leave you with “Checo” Pérez and his knowledge about what a professional should do after a race (He flew to Mexico to see his mom and got coronavirus)



13 juil. 2020

Triathlon and the New World with Coronavirus


After coronavirus life is not the same and perhaps never will be.  Not everybody take what is happening seriously but real triathletes are a different breed; they are more serious in recovery and training and today’s world is not the same.  We come back to what Malcolm Gladwell said in 2018.  The need to think analogically instead of digitally.  He said, doctors thought about a puzzle to solve when seeing patients in the past; today, with information from many fronts, he/she needs to see the patient as a mystery.  After failures of the governments, institutions and the WHO, we need to find our way out of this pandemia.  A criminal act was committed when they denied the coronavirus transmission through aerosol; advertising very primitively not needing to wear a mask. Our only rational choice is to face the pandemia without denying the threat of the virus and understanding that we are alone in a small team, if we have it.  Since April we wrote about it:
21 avr. 2020

We started learning since the beginning of the pandemic about the virus, to face the situation.  We have learned the following:
1)   The virus is transmitted via aerosol in addition to saliva drops.  Why?  We have the story about the chorus rehearsing and apparently keeping the distance between two people.  They said: “No one sneezed or coughed.”  One-day rehearsal, 60 people practicing, 45 sick, two deaths.
    This is more anecdotal, if you wish, but we have other sources of information.

We have the studies mentioned in the New England Journal of Medicine:

Malcolm does not know that what he is seeing what said long time ago: “Plato believed the world was to be discovered and Aristotle supposed that we were creating the world.” How we approach the world has different consequences and the coronavirus confront us with our obsolete thinking.


Following this way of thinking we can approach triathlon taking what Malcolm rediscover.  The story of David vs Goliath.  This is something we speak with our athletes.  If we are able to see the difference between people, “who is who,” we do not have problems with life.  Revisiting History the way Malcolm is doing it is needed right now for humanity.


The coronavirus as well as Goliath is something to be study as a mystery; our rivals are similar.  We have to find out how much is advertisement and how much is reality; Goliath was created to scare people not to fight.  It was like seeing Anthony Joshua fighting Andy Ruiz in the first fight.  That is how we created the first triathlon junior world champion (2018).